- Like many researchers and analysts of many Delhi organizations
- Delhi researchers and analysts gave this BBC opinion
- Researchers do not match the position of the Indian government
Some researchers and analysts from the Indian capital, Delhi, said there was no doubt about the December 30th Bangladesh election that was "not free and fair," and its results are "incredible." They said that although the elections were not rigid, opponents could get fewer seats, but the number would not have been seven.
Researchers from several organizations, such as Bangladesh politicians who regularly visit ThinkTanks in New Delhi, say this to the BBC. However, the Indian government's position does not fit perfectly.
Keeping close ties with the government, one of the most prominent two think-tanks of the Vivekananda International Foundation and the Observer Research Foundation.
Fellow of the Vivekananda International Foundation, Sriradha Dutta, says the opposition alliance could not have come to power in Bangladesh, but because of the electoral rigging, their seats were so low. And the leadership crisis in the opposition coalition was strong. Their main leader is the fisherman, his son in London. And as it is called internationally as Kamal Hossain, people in the country do not vote for it.
Writing an Article in the RSS Discourse The Organizer, who is said to be the trustee of India's ruling BJP ideology, Srirada Dutt There he warned that such unilateral choices could save India's interest for a short period of time, but could lead to the disaster for a long time.
Senior Fellow of Observer Research Foundation, Joyita Bhattacharya, said the outcome of the election was surprising, but the people in Bangladesh actually took the narrative of the Awami League development. He said, "We think the people of Bangladesh want stability, they do not want to destabilize their country by the way their country progresses in economic development." Since 2014, the political attention of the people in Bangladesh has changed. He also said that if the opposition alliance were strong without them, they would not have the sphere of the challenges they might have before the government. Consequently, Sheikh Hasina seems to be able to lead the government for at least five years in safety.
But there are many questions about the December 30th elections, but India can not support the way it has accelerated, and China has hurriedly recognized it, Sriradha Dutt. He said: "We all know that it is unilateral elections. However, the way we came to give China the legitimacy, we would say it was quite a lot," he said. "Even after the 2014 elections, I did the same with Sheikh Hasina. "
One of the Defense Analysis and Analysis Institutes, New Delhi, has recognized the recent Bangladeshi elections that are not controversial.
Their comments report also said that Bangladesh's democracy is not capable of building up to date a neutral electoral commission that any opposition party can trust.
But there is no disagreement about the choice of Sheikh Hasina, the best bet and the only option for India in the power of Dhaka. (Pot)
In Bangladesh, "the choice for deception"